H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 1-3

Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 3–1 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2016 Beijing second round 6-1 5-3.

ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2016 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Yaroslava Shvedova #41 6-1 5-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #8 Match data
Apr 26, 2013* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Yaroslava Shvedova #37 7-5 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #23 Match data
Jun 2, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Yaroslava Shvedova #142 6-4 7-5 Carla Suárez Navarro #46 Match data
Jan 14, 2010* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #33 6-1 6-2 Yaroslava Shvedova #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,751 141 175 44.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Yaroslava Shvedova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,470 0 1
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,665 0 1
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,576 0 1
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2012 16–12 57.1% #29 1,688 0 1
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,632 0 1
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,640 0 1
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,615 0 1
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2016 16–16 50.0% #37 1,700 0 1
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2017 4–11 26.7% #289 1,598 0 1
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% 1,587 0 1
33 2021 1–9 10.0% #434 1,493 0 1