H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Kirsten Flipkens H2H: 3-1
Caroline Garcia holds a 3–1 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2021 Indian Wells first round 5-7 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 5-7 6-4 6-0 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2016* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2016* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Caroline Garcia | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| May 18, 2016* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 6-1 6-2 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Kirsten Flipkens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |