H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Yingying Duan H2H: 1-0
Caroline Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 6-1 6-0 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Caroline Garcia | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |