H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-0
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 1–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2009 Madrid semifinal 7-6(1) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Caroline Wozniacki | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Wozniacki | Amélie Mauresmo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 |
| 26 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 |
| 27 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 |
| 28 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 |
| 29 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |