H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Na Li H2H: 0-4

Na Li holds a 4–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Italian Open round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #2 6-1 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #53 Match data May 15, 2014* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Na Li #8 6-4 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #92 Match data Aug 30, 2012* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #48 6-2 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #41 Match data Jun 19, 2008* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Na Li #76 7-6(1) 6-0 Casey Dellacqua #285 Match data Jan 14, 2005* R16 Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,757 80 106 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,489 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,472 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,501 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2008 18–17 51.4% #53 1,629 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,597 0 0 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,563 0 0 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,541 0 0 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,592 0 0 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,490 0 0 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,741 0 0 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,628 0 0 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 — — — — — — — 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Casey Dellacqua Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 11 9 20 55.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2014 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2015 3 9 12 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 53 74 127 41.7% 10 16 26 38.5% 17 16 33 51.5% — — — — — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 163/185 of Casey Dellacqua's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Casey Dellacqua Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 1/2 2.0 6.0 53.4% 56.4% 41.2% 66.7% 37.5% 49.3% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1/3 1.0 7.0 54.3% 63.2% 50.0% 33.3% 42.9% 57.1% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1/7 1.0 7.0 47.4% 55.6% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 47.4% 26.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 17/18 1.8 3.6 60.5% 60.6% 44.5% 42.3% 53.2% 54.1% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 31/35 2.9 4.3 58.6% 63.1% 44.2% 54.4% 49.5% 55.4% 45.2% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2009 3/3 1.0 5.3 52.8% 46.5% 36.2% 28.4% 13.9% 42.2% 38.4% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2010 7/7 1.0 3.4 53.5% 55.2% 40.5% 37.9% 37.3% 48.1% 42.3% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2011 6/8 2.0 4.5 64.2% 60.4% 45.9% 63.2% 81.9% 55.0% 44.2% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2012 22/24 1.0 3.8 62.7% 59.3% 39.5% 49.5% 47.4% 51.8% 43.4% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2013 9/9 0.9 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 45.2% 49.0% 53.9% 52.6% 33.7% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2014 41/44 1.7 3.0 59.5% 62.2% 49.4% 54.3% 48.9% 56.9% 43.5% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2015 24/25 2.0 3.3 62.4% 61.9% 50.1% 52.0% 50.0% 57.4% 39.6% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 163/186 1.8 3.6 60.1% 60.8% 45.6% 50.9% 49.4% 54.6% 42.6% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Casey Dellacqua Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1489 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.02 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2004 1473 96.4 -3.43 -1.30 0.865 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2005 1475 101.7 -1.70 -1.14 0.860 46.6% +3 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1501 113.4 -0.08 -1.23 0.504 37.7% -2 — — 37.5% -1.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1502 122.1 -1.56 -0.63 0.973 49.3% +17 — +91 43.2% -0.18 1–7 (13%) — — -0.01 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2008 1630 126.8 -0.29 +1.02 1.014 50.2% +9 -98 -24 47.5% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 103.0 +0.09 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2009 1598 101.9 -2.95 -1.13 0.664 40.6% +4 — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.17 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2010 1563 103.6 -3.53 -0.93 0.814 45.4% +23 — — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.55 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2011 1541 104.0 -1.59 -2.06 0.982 49.7% — -17 — 42.1% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.43 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2012 1593 122.1 -1.70 -0.55 0.901 47.8% -3 — +45 42.3% -0.52 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.51 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2013 1490 95.2 -2.07 -4.32 0.712 44.0% +4 — — 15.8% -2.16 0–1 0–2 — +1.12 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2014 1742 139.6 +0.67 +0.45 1.011 50.3% -28 -176 -39 55.2% +0.23 13–6 (68%) 4–5 (44%) 108.7 +0.21 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2015 1629 117.9 -0.10 -0.71 0.929 48.4% -22 -90 +90 43.1% -0.65 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 -0.22 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2016 1613 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 1758 127.4 -0.70 -0.33 0.939 48.7% -5 -99 +29 43.8% -0.46 31–34 (48%) 14–22 (39%) 100.0 +0.60 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.