H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Casey Dellacqua vs Na Li H2H: 0-4
Na Li holds a 4–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Rome third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2014* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Na Li | 6-1 6-4 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Na Li | 6-4 6-4 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2008* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Na Li | 6-2 6-4 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2005* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Na Li | 7-6(1) 6-0 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casey Dellacqua | Na Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 |