H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Caty Mcnally vs Ajla Tomljanovic H2H: 3-1
Caty Mcnally holds a 3–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Caty Mcnally leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2026 's-Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | 's-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-4 6-4 | Caty Mcnally | Match data |
| May 24, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Caty Mcnally | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2025 | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Caty Mcnally | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Caty Mcnally | 6-4 (ret.) | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caty Mcnally | #57 | #50 | 1,136 | 1,834 | 59 | 69 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caty Mcnally | Ajla Tomljanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #142 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #148 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #540 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #85 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #57 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |