H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chanelle Scheepers vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 2-3

Maria Kirilenko holds a 3–2 lead over Chanelle Scheepers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2012 US Open first round 6-2 6-1.

RSA Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Maria Kirilenko #12 6-2 6-1 Chanelle Scheepers #40 Match data
Sep 24, 2011* Guangzhou WTA 250 SF Hard Chanelle Scheepers #73 7-5 5-7 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #28 Match data
May 25, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Maria Kirilenko #27 6-1 6-4 Chanelle Scheepers #65 Match data
Feb 16, 2011* Dubai WTA 1000 R64 Hard Chanelle Scheepers #78 6-2 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #26 Match data
Aug 5, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Maria Kirilenko #51 4-6 6-3 6-1 Chanelle Scheepers #146 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanelle Scheepers #429 #37 1,505 1,725 87 108 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2003 1–1 50.0% #299 1,503 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2008 0–2 0.0% #187 1,485 0 0 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2009 4–8 33.3% #127 1,484 0 0 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2010 7–9 43.8% #103 1,523 0 0 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2011 20–19 51.3% #38 1,658 0 1 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2012 24–26 48.0% #60 1,677 0 1
29 2013 15–21 41.7% #80 1,572 0 1
30 2014 15–17 46.9% #77 1,620 0 1
31 2015 1–5 16.7% #424 1,569 0 1