H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chanelle Scheepers vs Melinda Czink H2H: 1-0
Chanelle Scheepers holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanelle Scheepers won the 2012 Sydney third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2012* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Chanelle Scheepers | 6-4 6-2 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chanelle Scheepers | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |