H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Kristyna Pliskova H2H: 1-0
Chloe Paquet holds a 1–0 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chloe Paquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chloe Paquet won the 2017 Roland Garros first round 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chloe Paquet | Kristyna Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |