H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Chris Newton vs Claudia Casabianca H2H: 0-1

Claudia Casabianca holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Newton in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Claudia Casabianca won the 1981 Rio de Janeiro round of 32 6-1 6-3.

H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudia Casabianca 6-1 6-3 Chris Newton Match data Apr 2, 1981* R32 Rio de Janeiro WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Newton — — — 1,675 45 48 48.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Claudia Casabianca — — — 1,671 28 26 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Newton Claudia Casabianca
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 0–6 0.0% — 1,443 0 0
19 1975 1–3 25.0% — 1,471 0 0 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,453 0 0
20 1976 1–3 25.0% — 1,466 0 0 1980 20–11 64.5% — 1,621 0 2
21 1977 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1981 7–6 53.8% — 1,640 0 2
22 1978 2–3 40.0% — 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1979 3–3 50.0% — 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1980 30–18 62.5% — 1,583 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1981 6–11 35.3% — 1,528 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1982 1–5 16.7% — 1,479 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Newton Claudia Casabianca
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 0 1 100.0% 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1977 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1978 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 5 11 54.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 17 21 38 44.7% — 1 4 5 20.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Newton Claudia Casabianca
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1482 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1476 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1444 113.4 — — — — — +16 — 14.3% -2.22 0–2 0–1 — -0.70
19 1975 1472 98.8 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — +0.47 1979 1453 101.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.67 1–1 — — +0.26
20 1976 1466 97.2 — — — — — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–1 — +0.42 1980 1621 134.7 — — — — -67 -65 — 61.8% +1.16 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.8 -0.02
21 1977 1457 100.0 — — — — — — +66 44.4% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.24 1981 1641 130.3 — — — — — — — 57.7% +0.88 1–1 0–1 — -0.47
22 1978 1459 103.2 — — — — — — +71 40.0% -0.80 — — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 1454 95.4 — — — — — — +70 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–0 — +1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 1584 123.3 — — — — -7 -75 +19 60.0% +0.96 6–3 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 +5.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 1528 109.4 — — — — — — +49 40.5% -0.32 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1480 92.8 — — — — — -13 — 23.1% -2.31 0–1 1–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1675 112.8 — — — — -7 -47 +43 48.0% +0.02 9–9 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 101.3 +9.54 — 1671 131.8 — — — — -67 -50 — 53.3% +0.54 6–10 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 -1.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.