H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Christiane Jolissaint vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-1
Christiane Jolissaint and Pam Casale are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet, while Christiane Jolissaint leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 Boston third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 64
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1984* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 6-1 6-3 | Christiane Jolissaint | Match data |
| May 6, 1983* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Christiane Jolissaint | 6-3 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christiane Jolissaint | — | — | — | 1,754 | 95 | 131 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christiane Jolissaint | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |