H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Christiane Jolissaint vs Tine Scheuer Larsen H2H: 2-1
Christiane Jolissaint holds a 2–1 lead over Tine Scheuer Larsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Christiane Jolissaint leads 2–0 on grass, while Tine Scheuer Larsen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tine Scheuer Larsen won the 1985 Amelia Island second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 64
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 60
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1985* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Tine Scheuer Larsen | 6-2 6-1 | Christiane Jolissaint | Match data |
| Nov 30, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Christiane Jolissaint | 1-6 7-6(7) 6-1 | Tine Scheuer Larsen | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1984* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Christiane Jolissaint | 6-2 6-2 | Tine Scheuer Larsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christiane Jolissaint | — | — | — | 1,754 | 95 | 131 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tine Scheuer Larsen | — | — | — | 1,735 | 71 | 91 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christiane Jolissaint | Tine Scheuer Larsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–19 | 53.7% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |