H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Christina Mchale vs Alla Kudryavtseva H2H: 2-1
Christina Mchale holds a 2–1 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Christina Mchale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alla Kudryavtseva won the 2014 Charleston second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2014* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Alla Kudryavtseva | 6-3 7-5 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2011* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-3 3-1 (ret.) | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Christina Mchale | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Alla Kudryavtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |