H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Christina Mchale vs Nicole Gibbs H2H: 1-1
Christina Mchale and Nicole Gibbs are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Gibbs won the 2016 Monterrey fourth round 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2017 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Nicole Gibbs | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2017 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Nicole Gibbs | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2016* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Nicole Gibbs | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 3-0 (ret.) | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2014* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Nicole Gibbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicole Gibbs | #175 | #68 | 946 | 1,692 | 37 | 60 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #109 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #123 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |