H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Christina Mchale vs Serena Williams H2H: 1-4

Serena Williams holds a 4–1 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2020 Auckland fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Christina Mchale
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2020* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Serena Williams #10 3-6 6-2 6-3 Christina Mchale #86 Match data
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Serena Williams #1 6-7(7) 6-2 6-4 Christina Mchale #65 Match data
May 13, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #1 7-6(7) 6-1 Christina Mchale #56 Match data
Mar 23, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-3 5-7 6-2 Christina Mchale #56 Match data
May 15, 2015* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Christina Mchale #65 (w/o) Serena Williams #1 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 166 207 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christina Mchale Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,556 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,716 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2012 21–20 51.2% #33 1,676 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,636 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,635 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2016 24–21 53.3% #45 1,698 0 1 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2017 19–26 42.2% #64 1,690 0 1 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,568 0 1 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,652 0 1 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,524 0 1 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,452 0 1 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 — — — — — — — 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71