H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Claudine Schaul vs Ekaterina Bychkova H2H: 0-1
Ekaterina Bychkova holds a 1–0 lead over Claudine Schaul in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Bychkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Bychkova won the 2005 Portoroz third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 42
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2005* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Bychkova | 7-5 6-3 | Claudine Schaul | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudine Schaul | #1,188 | #41 | 767 | 1,675 | 27 | 48 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudine Schaul | Ekaterina Bychkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #339 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #174 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |