H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 1-1
Coco Gauff and Ashleigh Barty are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on clay, while Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2022 Adelaide 1 fourth round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2022* | Adelaide 1 | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| May 15, 2021* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Coco Gauff | 4-6 1-2 (ret.) | Ashleigh Barty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 |