H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Johanna Konta H2H: 2-0
Coco Gauff holds a 2–0 lead over Johanna Konta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2021 Montreal fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2021* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Coco Gauff | (w/o) | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-3 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |