H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 3-0
Coco Gauff holds a 3–0 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2025 US Open third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-1 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| May 10, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-3 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-1 6-2 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |