H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Martina Trevisan H2H: 2-1
Coco Gauff holds a 2–1 lead over Martina Trevisan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2022 Guadalajara 2 fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022* | Guadalajara 2 | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-0 6-3 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-1 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Martina Trevisan | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |