H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Nadia Podoroska H2H: 1-0
Coco Gauff holds a 1–0 lead over Nadia Podoroska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2024 Miami second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2024* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-1 6-2 | Nadia Podoroska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Nadia Podoroska | #471 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,762 | 53 | 78 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |