Coco Gauff
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 3 | 11 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 7 | 13 | Mar 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Paula Badosa | 4 | 5 | 9 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Coco Gauff and Naomi Osaka are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2025 US Open fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-2 | Coco Gauff | Match data | Sep 1, 2025 | R16 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Coco Gauff | 3-6 6-4 0-0 (ret.) | Naomi Osaka | Match data | Oct 2, 2024* | R16 | China Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Coco Gauff | 6-4 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data | Aug 5, 2022* | R16 | San Jose | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Naomi Osaka | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Coco Gauff | Match data | Aug 19, 2021* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data | Jan 26, 2020* | R32 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-0 | Coco Gauff | Match data | Aug 31, 2019* | R32 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #5 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,176 | 287 | 114 | 71.6% | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| Naomi Osaka | #18 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,178 | 253 | 138 | 64.7% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,119 | 1 | 9 | 2018 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,902 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,101 | 2 | 11 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,046 | 2 | 5 |
| 22 | 2026 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,137 | 2 | 12 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,111 | 3 | 6 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,039 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,933 | 4 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,872 | 4 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,959 | 4 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #18 | 2,059 | 4 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2019 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 59.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2016 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 40 | 9 | 49 | 81.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2017 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2024 | 35 | 10 | 45 | 77.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2018 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 2025 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2019 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 81.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2026 | 30 | 8 | 38 | 78.9% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2020 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| Career | — | 184 | 74 | 258 | 71.3% | 77 | 26 | 103 | 74.8% | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | — | 192 | 90 | 282 | 68.1% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 383/402 of Coco Gauff's and 354/390 of Naomi Osaka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2019 | 16/16 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 65.0% | 63.7% | 42.2% | 52.0% | 54.1% | 56.1% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 18/18 | 3.1 | 8.3 | 61.0% | 69.1% | 42.3% | 46.5% | 55.8% | 58.6% | 41.7% | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 65.3% | 44.8% | 33.6% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 41.0% |
| 17 | 2021 | 49/51 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 60.9% | 69.1% | 47.5% | 55.5% | 44.3% | 60.6% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 58/60 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 67.1% | 45.3% | 57.8% | 49.0% | 59.2% | 45.2% | 2016 | 33/33 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 48.3% | 54.8% | 51.5% | 59.9% | 43.8% |
| 19 | 2023 | 66/67 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 60.1% | 68.8% | 48.2% | 56.6% | 51.7% | 60.7% | 46.1% | 2017 | 40/41 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 45.6% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 40.2% |
| 20 | 2024 | 68/71 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 58.4% | 73.6% | 45.5% | 56.7% | 52.8% | 62.1% | 49.7% | 2018 | 55/60 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 71.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 55.7% | 61.9% | 45.3% |
| 21 | 2025 | 54/60 | 2.7 | 6.9 | 62.4% | 67.8% | 45.3% | 49.7% | 57.7% | 59.4% | 49.6% | 2019 | 50/53 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 60.2% | 73.1% | 47.9% | 56.3% | 51.0% | 63.1% | 44.4% |
| 22 | 2026 | 54/59 | 3.2 | 4.9 | 63.0% | 67.8% | 44.7% | 48.7% | 49.7% | 59.4% | 47.8% | 2020 | 18/19 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 64.2% | 43.2% | 66.5% | 42.5% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21/28 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 53.5% | 76.2% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 52.6% | 64.9% | 43.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22/26 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 51.4% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 61.9% | 44.1% | 62.7% | 41.4% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 36/38 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 75.1% | 51.1% | 56.3% | 50.1% | 64.0% | 40.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 34/46 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 56.9% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 52.5% | 53.6% | 63.5% | 45.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 41/42 | 5.9 | 2.4 | 58.5% | 72.9% | 49.5% | 54.5% | 47.6% | 63.2% | 42.4% |
| Career | — | 383/402 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 61.3% | 69.0% | 45.8% | 53.9% | 51.4% | 60.1% | 46.7% | — | 354/392 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 57.0% | 72.6% | 48.9% | 54.8% | 50.3% | 62.3% | 43.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2019 | 1694 | 127.4 | -0.40 | -1.45 | 0.957 | 49.2% | -25 | — | +15 | 57.1% | -0.11 | 5–0 (100%) | 3–0 (100%) | 110.5 | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 1782 | 144.9 | +0.78 | +0.22 | 1.007 | 50.4% | -13 | -207 | — | 57.8% | +0.27 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.2 | -1.07 | 2014 | 1531 | 113.6 | +0.17 | +0.57 | 0.923 | 48.4% | +17 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 |
| 17 | 2021 | 1898 | 145.4 | +3.52 | +2.26 | 1.130 | 52.5% | -104 | +10 | -86 | 60.2% | +0.65 | 13–6 (68%) | 10–7 (59%) | 108.1 | +0.08 | 2015 | 1509 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 |
| 18 | 2022 | 1927 | 158.3 | +2.88 | +2.90 | 1.106 | 52.0% | -48 | +74 | -46 | 62.5% | +0.84 | 6–4 (60%) | 10–6 (63%) | 103.4 | -1.68 | 2016 | 1700 | 128.3 | +3.18 | +0.66 | 1.091 | 51.9% | -10 | -101 | — | 60.0% | +0.65 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.0 | +0.04 |
| 19 | 2023 | 2107 | 166.1 | +4.50 | +4.45 | 1.173 | 53.4% | +40 | -133 | -245 | 70.9% | +1.39 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–1 (89%) | 106.9 | -0.71 | 2017 | 1696 | 132.1 | +1.30 | -2.12 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +6 | -84 | -46 | 45.8% | -0.18 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.8 | -1.51 |
| 20 | 2024 | 2120 | 167.7 | +4.83 | +6.58 | 1.311 | 55.6% | +53 | -73 | -151 | 70.9% | +1.78 | 12–8 (60%) | 9–7 (56%) | 99.0 | +0.77 | 2018 | 1902 | 160.7 | +5.21 | +2.94 | 1.190 | 53.8% | +17 | -236 | -168 | 67.5% | +1.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.8 | -2.09 |
| 21 | 2025 | 2101 | 167.3 | +2.65 | +6.44 | 1.221 | 54.4% | +19 | +119 | — | 66.9% | +1.29 | 12–3 (80%) | 10–6 (63%) | 106.5 | +0.40 | 2019 | 2047 | 154.9 | +5.80 | +1.63 | 1.202 | 53.6% | +30 | -229 | -350 | 68.4% | +1.22 | 17–2 (89%) | 10–4 (71%) | 116.1 | +0.63 |
| 22 | 2026 | 2138 | 166.4 | +3.06 | +5.69 | 1.177 | 53.5% | +48 | +30 | -178 | 68.1% | +1.31 | 18–10 (64%) | 9–4 (69%) | 106.4 | -0.18 | 2020 | 2112 | 156.0 | +6.66 | +1.24 | 1.267 | 54.0% | +18 | — | — | 71.7% | +1.61 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–5 (38%) | 103.1 | -0.43 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2040 | 154.1 | +6.00 | +1.08 | 1.240 | 54.0% | +82 | -235 | — | 72.2% | +1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.5 | -0.04 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1934 | 147.9 | +4.77 | +0.02 | 1.112 | 52.0% | +91 | -156 | — | 57.4% | +0.81 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1873 | 146.8 | +5.89 | -1.17 | 1.122 | 52.2% | +76 | -98 | -157 | 56.3% | +0.71 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.1 | -2.05 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1959 | 153.2 | +4.80 | +1.97 | 1.240 | 54.1% | +53 | -121 | -236 | 65.1% | +1.10 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | 102.1 | +1.00 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2059 | 160.0 | +5.33 | +0.83 | 1.152 | 53.0% | +2 | -112 | -119 | 67.0% | +1.13 | 9–3 (75%) | 9–4 (69%) | 109.8 | -1.11 |
| Career | — | 2177 | 166.4 | +3.34 | +4.32 | 1.170 | 53.3% | +7 | +5 | -126 | 66.2% | +1.15 | 80–42 (66%) | 62–33 (65%) | 114.1 | -0.57 | — | 2179 | 157.2 | +4.74 | +0.81 | 1.143 | 52.6% | +34 | -158 | -154 | 62.8% | +0.95 | 71–38 (65%) | 50–46 (52%) | 107.7 | -1.69 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 3 | 11 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 7 | 13 | Mar 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Paula Badosa | 4 | 5 | 9 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 7 | 4 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 16, 2024 | H2H |