H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:17 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Qinwen Zheng H2H: 3-0
Coco Gauff holds a 3–0 lead over Qinwen Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2025 Rome semifinal 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Coco Gauff | 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
| Nov 9, 2024* | Riyadh Finals | WTA Finals | F | Hard | Coco Gauff | 3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
| May 17, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Coco Gauff | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 |