H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 1-0
Coco Gauff holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Peterson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2023 Indian Wells fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2023* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Rebecca Peterson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |