H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 3-1
Coco Gauff holds a 3–1 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 3–0 on clay, while Yulia Putintseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2024 Cincinnati third round 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| May 12, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-0 6-1 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| May 2, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| May 12, 2021* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |