H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 0-1

Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2014 Japan Women's Open round of 16 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ana Konjuh
Croatia Age 28 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ana Konjuh #113 6-2 3-6 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #38 Match data Oct 10, 2014* R16 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ana Konjuh #647 #20 1,830 1,786 84 81 50.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ana Konjuh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 2014 8–6 57.1% #93 1,611 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2015 11–9 55.0% #82 1,656 0 1
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0 2016 19–14 57.6% #47 1,683 0 1
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2017 22–18 55.0% #44 1,716 0 1
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2018 1–3 25.0% #385 1,688 0 1
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #1282 1,645 0 1
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2021 17–14 54.8% #67 1,690 0 1
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2 2022 6–13 31.6% #108 1,647 0 1
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2 2023 0–2 0.0% #407 1,587 0 1
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,464 0 1
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ana Konjuh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 12 7 19 63.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7%
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 2021 9 8 17 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2023 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — 49 49 98 50.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 16 11 27 59.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 156/165 of Ana Konjuh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ana Konjuh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% 2014 14/14 5.4 5.8 53.2% 68.0% 43.3% 47.2% 39.0% 56.7% 40.4%
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% 2015 17/20 3.2 3.8 58.4% 65.2% 50.4% 56.8% 59.7% 58.7% 44.3%
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% 2016 28/33 3.9 5.1 53.6% 70.2% 45.2% 57.5% 47.1% 58.3% 43.6%
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2017 40/40 3.6 4.7 57.7% 67.7% 44.6% 52.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2018 4/4 3.8 3.0 62.5% 57.0% 35.7% 58.3% 24.2% 48.3% 40.7%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2019 1/1 3.0 8.0 42.6% 76.9% 42.9% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 27.9%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2021 31/31 3.9 7.4 59.0% 62.8% 42.4% 54.1% 48.3% 54.4% 44.9%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2022 18/19 4.5 5.7 57.5% 64.9% 39.5% 51.1% 36.4% 53.9% 39.7%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2023 2/2 4.0 5.5 54.5% 67.3% 41.9% 67.7% 14.3% 55.7% 29.4%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2025 1/1 0.0 8.0 42.6% 60.9% 48.4% 42.9% 33.3% 53.7% 36.4%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 156/165 3.9 5.4 56.8% 66.3% 43.9% 53.7% 46.7% 56.5% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ana Konjuh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 2014 1611 123.8 +0.22 -1.66 0.933 48.3% -10 — +44 47.4% -0.24 8–2 (80%) 1–1 — -0.76
17 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 2015 1657 117.4 +0.42 +1.27 1.073 51.6% -67 -102 +82 52.3% +0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.20
18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28 2016 1684 123.8 +2.55 +0.13 1.047 51.1% +5 -132 -1 58.0% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +1.16
19 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49 2017 1716 135.7 +1.25 +0.51 1.028 50.5% -10 -157 +78 54.1% +0.13 9–6 (60%) 8–5 (62%) 104.6 -0.34
20 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2018 1688 106.6 -1.09 +0.29 0.789 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10
21 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2019 1646 96.7 -2.44 -2.78 0.654 42.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00
22 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2020 1622 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2021 1691 127.3 -0.62 +0.89 0.985 49.7% +1 -22 — 52.8% +0.03 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 -0.51
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2022 1647 126.6 -1.90 -1.85 0.861 46.8% +43 -54 — 36.4% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -1.32
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2023 1587 109.7 -2.35 -4.08 0.664 42.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2024 1554 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2025 1465 98.2 +2.05 -0.61 0.785 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2026 1446 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94 — 1786 128.7 +0.44 +0.04 0.982 49.6% -3 -88 +62 50.3% -0.09 35–23 (60%) 21–15 (58%) 109.5 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.