H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Coco Vandeweghe vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 1-2
Angelique Kerber holds a 2–1 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 6-2 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2015* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-1 3-1 (ret.) | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2014* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 7-6(4) 0-6 6-2 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,877 | 138 | 151 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Vandeweghe | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |