H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 1-0

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 1–0 lead over Johanna Larsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2015 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-7(3) 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Johanna Larsson
Sweden Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #48 6-7(3) 6-1 6-1 Johanna Larsson #72 Match data Jun 24, 2015* R64 Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Johanna Larsson #236 #45 1,230 1,733 153 178 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Johanna Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #389 1,502 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #177 1,509 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #172 1,492 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% #69 1,555 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2011 19–18 51.4% #59 1,666 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2012 14–19 42.4% #73 1,624 0 0
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2 2013 13–16 44.8% #84 1,624 0 0
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2 2014 7–15 31.8% #70 1,596 0 0
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2015 25–19 56.8% #56 1,668 0 1
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2 2016 29–25 53.7% #50 1,707 0 1
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2017 15–21 41.7% #80 1,623 0 1
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 2018 17–18 48.6% #75 1,599 0 2
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2019 3–13 18.8% #217 1,557 0 2
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #236 1,543 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Johanna Larsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2012 6 11 17 35.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 19 15 34 55.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 1 7 8 12.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — — — — — 78 100 178 43.8% 72 62 134 53.7% 3 15 18 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 295/330 of Johanna Larsson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Johanna Larsson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2008 2/2 3.0 2.5 44.9% 79.7% 47.8% 53.3% 12.5% 62.4% 34.1%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2009 2/2 3.0 5.0 52.5% 63.7% 45.6% 41.9% 45.5% 55.2% 41.4%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2010 16/18 3.0 2.8 60.5% 67.0% 45.2% 65.3% 43.3% 58.2% 42.3%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2011 32/37 1.8 3.3 61.4% 59.4% 44.9% 49.2% 48.7% 53.7% 43.6%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2012 30/33 2.2 3.4 59.5% 58.3% 45.2% 49.6% 46.8% 52.6% 41.5%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2013 24/29 2.0 3.0 63.8% 61.0% 44.1% 51.3% 37.7% 55.0% 39.5%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2014 18/22 1.5 3.3 71.1% 56.8% 43.4% 47.0% 43.4% 53.0% 40.0%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2015 30/44 1.5 2.9 69.7% 59.8% 54.4% 50.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2016 53/55 2.3 3.6 63.4% 60.9% 45.5% 49.9% 47.1% 55.3% 43.8%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% 2017 36/36 1.4 3.5 67.2% 59.2% 43.0% 50.3% 38.8% 53.9% 41.3%
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% 2018 35/35 1.8 3.8 62.2% 60.7% 45.9% 50.0% 41.9% 55.0% 42.7%
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% 2019 16/16 1.5 3.2 64.3% 55.9% 42.5% 50.7% 41.2% 51.1% 34.7%
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% 2020 1/1 0.0 3.0 65.0% 42.3% 35.7% 50.0% 0.0% 40.0% 30.4%
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 295/332 1.9 3.3 64.0% 60.0% 45.6% 50.7% 44.2% 54.7% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Johanna Larsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 2006 1503 104.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 — — +0.16
18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49 2008 1510 100.9 +0.29 -1.15 0.907 46.1% — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 1–0 — +0.06
20 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2009 1493 103.2 -0.43 -1.92 0.925 48.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2010 1555 121.7 +0.59 -1.39 1.013 50.2% +38 -47 — 47.1% -0.15 0–2 2–3 (40%) — +0.25
22 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2011 1666 118.5 -1.99 -0.93 0.942 48.7% -78 -7 -63 48.2% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.7 -0.99
23 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2012 1625 112.1 -1.63 -2.02 0.876 47.3% -42 +36 — 39.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 5–1 (83%) 101.4 +0.21
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2013 1624 121.5 -0.43 -2.79 0.877 47.2% -56 +95 — 42.4% -0.42 6–2 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 -1.47
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2014 1596 123.3 -2.35 -1.81 0.853 46.6% -12 +47 — 32.7% -0.78 3–2 (60%) 1–6 (14%) 98.3 -1.78
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2015 1668 125.8 -0.89 +0.77 1.028 50.4% -9 +58 -181 54.9% +0.21 3–4 (43%) 8–5 (62%) 101.5 +0.01
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2016 1708 126.0 -0.78 +0.26 0.982 49.7% +5 +2 — 54.4% -0.04 9–10 (47%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.87
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2017 1624 122.5 -2.11 -1.71 0.896 47.6% +12 +71 — 43.2% -0.48 6–5 (55%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.48
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 2018 1600 119.2 -1.77 -0.96 0.947 48.7% -13 +94 -110 47.0% -0.55 8–7 (53%) 9–1 (90%) 111.4 -1.03
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 2019 1558 102.9 -3.75 -5.03 0.710 43.5% -46 +116 — 18.8% -2.53 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -1.07
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 2020 1544 90.5 +0.79 -0.26 0.507 34.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.14
Career — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94 — 1733 124.4 -1.43 -1.21 0.922 48.2% -15 +46 -113 45.3% -0.47 49–44 (53%) 42–38 (53%) 106.7 -2.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.