H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 1-1

Coco Vandeweghe and Kaia Kanepi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2018 Indian Wells Open second round 6-0 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #16 6-0 7-6(6) Kaia Kanepi #64 Match data Mar 10, 2018* R64 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kaia Kanepi #43 6-2 6-2 Coco Vandeweghe #97 Match data Sep 29, 2011* R32 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe — #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kaia Kanepi — #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,452 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,733 0 2 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,859 0 2 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,799 0 1
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,690 0 2 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,862 0 3
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,732 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,777 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,762 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kaia Kanepi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — — — — — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kaia Kanepi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9%
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2%
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0%
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7%
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.5% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kaia Kanepi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1479 103.9 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.4 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +19 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28
17 2009 1466 104.3 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +12 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03
18 2010 1568 120.3 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +6 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1544 108.1 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +39 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.50 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
20 2012 1606 131.2 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
21 2013 1564 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +54 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19
22 2014 1732 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -19 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2007 1582 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +15 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +0.14
23 2015 1726 124.2 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -37 -234 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2008 1762 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -3 -51 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.02
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +156 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2009 1604 134.3 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.80
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2010 1843 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -59 -101 -166 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -0.99
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -29 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2013 1839 132.4 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -38 +74 -165 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -63 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 2014 1720 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +37 +80 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 2015 1660 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +50 +99 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 2016 1664 113.1 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 125.5 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +34 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1777 140.4 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +33 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.22
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career — 1880 133.0 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.95 — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +23 +4 -154 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.