H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-2

Madison Brengle holds a 2–1 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Madison Brengle leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2016 S-Hertogenbosch semifinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Madison Brengle
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 2016* S-Hertogenbosch WTA 250 SF Grass Coco Vandeweghe #43 6-4 6-2 Madison Brengle #68 Match data
Jan 20, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Madison Brengle #49 6-3 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #42 Match data
Jan 24, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Madison Brengle #64 6-3 6-2 Coco Vandeweghe #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Madison Brengle #210 #35 1,324 1,740 94 151 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,502 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,456 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,459 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,503 0 0
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,627 0 0
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2016 16–22 42.1% #73 1,602 0 0
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,656 0 0
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,606 0 0
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,641 0 0
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,637 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,586 0 0