H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 0-4

Magdalena Rybarikova holds a 4–0 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Rybarikova leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Rybarikova won the 2018 New Haven third round 2-6 6-4 2-3 RET.

USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 4
4 main draw meetings
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 2018* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Magdalena Rybarikova #31 2-6 6-4 2-3 (ret.) Coco Vandeweghe #23 Match data
Jul 13, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Magdalena Rybarikova #87 6-3 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #25 Match data
May 30, 2017* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Magdalena Rybarikova #192 6-1 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #20 Match data
Jun 9, 2011* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Magdalena Rybarikova #69 6-2 6-1 Coco Vandeweghe #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Magdalena Rybarikova #199 #17 2,405 1,817 188 207 47.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Magdalena Rybarikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #342 1,515 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #231 1,491 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2008 9–9 50.0% #59 1,568 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2009 27–26 50.9% #44 1,694 0 1
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2010 12–21 36.4% #106 1,582 0 1
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2011 14–14 50.0% #71 1,607 0 2
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2012 13–16 44.8% #62 1,605 0 3
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2013 29–22 56.9% #37 1,739 0 4
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2014 20–26 43.5% #50 1,691 0 4
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2015 16–22 42.1% #80 1,610 0 4
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2016 6–6 50.0% #154 1,665 0 4
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2017 19–11 63.3% #20 1,794 0 4
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2018 16–21 43.2% #48 1,677 0 4
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2019 5–9 35.7% #176 1,608 0 4
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2