H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 0-1

Maria Kirilenko holds a 1–0 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2011 Roland Garros round of 128 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Kirilenko #27 7-6(5) 6-2 Coco Vandeweghe #89 Match data May 24, 2011* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe — #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maria Kirilenko — #10 3,471 1,919 287 231 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,452 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,568 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2007 29–27 51.8% #25 1,740 0 2
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,721 0 5
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,830 0 5
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,733 0 2 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,859 0 2 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,690 0 2 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Maria Kirilenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 25 18 43 58.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — — — — — 204 152 356 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 385/515 of Maria Kirilenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Maria Kirilenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% 2003 3/10 0.7 4.7 67.0% 62.0% 54.6% 48.5% 58.2% 59.5% 41.0%
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% 2004 3/17 1.7 6.7 58.3% 62.1% 49.2% 53.1% 46.4% 56.7% 42.0%
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% 2005 9/50 1.6 2.7 59.7% 57.9% 43.6% 52.4% 52.3% 52.4% 35.9%
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2006 34/48 2.3 4.6 60.9% 63.7% 45.3% 51.9% 41.2% 56.5% 44.6%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2007 47/56 2.5 3.5 65.8% 64.6% 48.1% 52.4% 46.7% 58.8% 45.3%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2008 45/56 1.8 3.0 67.5% 61.8% 47.0% 51.0% 49.8% 57.0% 46.5%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2009 42/45 1.8 3.2 63.3% 61.6% 45.0% 49.9% 46.5% 55.6% 43.5%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2010 56/60 1.6 2.7 65.1% 64.4% 48.9% 51.5% 46.6% 59.0% 46.4%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2011 47/52 1.7 3.0 69.1% 62.7% 49.8% 48.9% 51.8% 58.6% 47.3%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2012 41/55 2.6 3.2 65.0% 65.3% 44.9% 52.7% 49.7% 58.2% 44.6%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2013 46/52 3.3 3.7 59.5% 64.8% 49.8% 56.9% 44.3% 58.9% 43.5%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2014 12/14 2.2 3.6 64.6% 59.2% 36.4% 48.8% 39.3% 50.9% 41.6%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.5% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 385/518 2.2 3.4 64.5% 63.3% 47.2% 51.8% 47.2% 57.6% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Maria Kirilenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1479 103.9 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52
16 2008 1453 104.4 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +19 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35
17 2009 1466 104.3 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +12 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -42 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38
18 2010 1568 120.3 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +6 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.24 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06
19 2011 1544 108.1 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +39 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.50 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13
20 2012 1606 131.2 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2007 1740 141.5 +3.14 +1.28 1.100 52.1% +5 -193 -198 54.3% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 -1.01
21 2013 1564 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +54 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2008 1725 136.9 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +94 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.03
22 2014 1732 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -19 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2009 1721 129.6 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -219 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.09
23 2015 1726 124.2 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -37 -234 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2010 1830 151.9 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -270 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +156 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2011 1849 143.8 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% -1 -89 -261 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +19 -110 -41 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -29 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2013 1792 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +15 +5 -69 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +13 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -63 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1880 133.0 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.95 — 1919 145.4 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.