H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Naomi Broady H2H: 1-0

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Broady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Naomi Broady
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #43 6-4 3-6 6-3 Naomi Broady #79 Match data May 24, 2016* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Naomi Broady #1,209 #76 875 1,604 24 42 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Naomi Broady
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #298 1,484 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #287 1,469 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2011 1–2 33.3% #196 1,472 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #287 1,463 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2 2014 1–3 25.0% #170 1,459 0 0
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2 2015 5–5 50.0% #121 1,511 0 0
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2016 10–15 40.0% #91 1,495 0 0
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2 2017 6–11 35.3% #117 1,551 0 0
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2018 1–3 25.0% #250 1,485 0 0
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Naomi Broady
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2015 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — 20 22 42 47.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 18 22 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 59/66 of Naomi Broady's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Naomi Broady
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2009 1/1 15.0 3.0 57.6% 70.6% 42.0% 61.5% 33.3% 58.5% 40.0%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2010 1/1 8.0 2.0 56.5% 74.4% 33.3% 50.0% 28.6% 56.5% 35.7%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2011 3/3 12.7 4.3 54.0% 75.3% 48.4% 69.0% 15.8% 63.3% 34.5%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2014 4/4 9.3 4.3 56.9% 70.8% 43.8% 46.7% 42.1% 59.1% 29.0%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2015 6/10 10.3 3.3 63.4% 78.6% 45.8% 46.4% 27.9% 66.7% 32.4%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2016 23/26 8.4 4.8 57.9% 70.2% 39.9% 50.5% 38.0% 57.4% 36.1%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2017 17/17 9.6 4.1 57.9% 74.7% 44.9% 49.7% 46.1% 62.0% 33.3%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% 2018 4/4 12.5 3.5 58.4% 64.4% 50.3% 64.0% 10.0% 58.8% 30.1%
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 59/67 9.6 4.2 58.2% 72.3% 43.3% 51.6% 36.3% 60.2% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Naomi Broady
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49 2009 1485 100.3 -1.38 -3.59 0.963 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.04
20 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2010 1470 99.4 -5.23 -2.65 0.821 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
21 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2011 1473 95.0 +1.81 -0.83 0.939 48.5% — — +46 37.5% -0.62 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
22 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2012 1463 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
23 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2014 1460 101.3 -0.21 -3.52 0.709 45.2% — — +50 30.0% -1.10 1–1 1–0 — +0.03
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2015 1511 105.2 +3.12 -3.00 0.975 48.6% +44 — -16 47.8% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.53
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2016 1495 109.2 +0.76 -4.87 0.847 47.1% +47 — -85 41.0% -0.85 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.2 -0.37
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2017 1551 114.6 +2.49 -5.32 0.876 47.9% +6 — -166 42.9% -0.71 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 -0.22
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2018 1485 104.1 +0.54 -1.89 0.732 44.6% +4 — — 30.0% -1.40 1–1 1–1 — -0.19
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 2019 1445 88.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 2021 1434 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94 — 1604 108.0 +1.33 -4.25 0.854 47.3% +30 — -43 39.8% -0.76 13–16 (45%) 11–13 (46%) 99.4 -0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.