H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 3-1

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 3–1 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2015 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 5, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Coco Vandeweghe #47 6-2 6-0 Samantha Stosur #23 Match data
Jan 22, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #37 6-4 6-4 Samantha Stosur #21 Match data
Mar 20, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #104 5-7 7-5 7-5 Samantha Stosur #20 Match data
Sep 1, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Samantha Stosur #10 6-3 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Samantha Stosur
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8
32 — — — — — — — 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 — — — — — — — 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 — — — — — — — 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 — — — — — — — 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 — — — — — — — 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9