H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Corina Morariu vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-0

Corina Morariu holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Corina Morariu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Corina Morariu won the 1996 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-0 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Corina Morariu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Corina Morariu #202 6-0 1-0 (ret.) Pam Shriver #126 Match data Mar 22, 1996* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Corina Morariu #755 #29 903 1,806 92 104 46.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Corina Morariu Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1995 0–1 0.0% #235 1,482 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1996 4–8 33.3% #121 1,496 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1997 12–11 52.2% #59 1,601 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1998 25–21 54.3% #31 1,735 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1999 22–23 48.9% #37 1,749 0 1 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 2000 20–19 51.3% #51 1,742 0 1 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 2001 5–11 31.2% #167 1,613 0 1 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 2002 2–4 33.3% #402 1,587 0 1 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 2003 2–6 25.0% #264 1,547 0 1 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 — — — — — — — 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 — — — — — — — 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 — — — — — — — 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 — — — — — — — 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Corina Morariu Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1998 11 10 21 52.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1999 10 14 24 41.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 2000 5 8 13 38.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 54 93 41.9% 42 30 72 58.3% 7 13 20 35.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Corina Morariu Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1995 1482 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.18 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1996 1496 111.1 — — — — +32 — — 30.8% -1.35 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.25 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1997 1601 117.2 — — — — -20 +26 -46 54.5% +0.05 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 104.2 +1.61 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1998 1736 136.8 — — — — -65 -13 -83 52.5% -0.03 10–5 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 106.9 +0.22 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1999 1750 149.3 — — — — -64 +24 -120 52.0% +0.25 3–9 (25%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 -1.12 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 2000 1742 134.4 — — — — -91 +93 — 55.7% +0.37 7–9 (44%) 2–6 (25%) 94.4 -0.80 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 2001 1614 115.5 — — — — +4 +95 — 40.0% -0.31 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — -0.11 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 2002 1587 117.7 — — — — +5 — — 45.5% -0.09 0–1 — — -0.07 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 2003 1548 100.0 -1.90 -1.71 0.765 43.9% — +155 — 22.2% -1.61 2–0 0–2 — -0.33 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 1807 137.0 -1.90 -1.71 0.765 43.9% -45 +51 -88 49.3% -0.06 30–36 (45%) 18–22 (45%) 98.6 -0.35 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.