Cristina Bucsa
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Yuliia Starodubtseva | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Jasmine Paolini | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 1, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Cristina Bucsa vs Lesia Tsurenko
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Cristina Bucsa vs Lesia Tsurenko.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Cristina Bucsa | Match data | Sep 12, 2021 | Q2 | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Lesia Tsurenko | 6-2 6-2 | Cristina Bucsa | Match data | Mar 6, 2021 | Q1 | Dubai Tennis Championships | WTA 1000 | Hard |
2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Bucsa | #40 | #30 | 1,446 | 1,816 | 57 | 91 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #386 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,898 | 180 | 202 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #161 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #61 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #103 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #40 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #27 | 1,808 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2013 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2014 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2015 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 27 | 2025 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2016 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 41 | 56 | 97 | 42.3% | 11 | 26 | 37 | 29.7% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | 122 | 127 | 249 | 49.0% | 34 | 48 | 82 | 41.5% | 24 | 27 | 51 | 47.1% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/149 of Cristina Bucsa's and 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 67.3% | 54.3% | 41.2% | 55.6% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 38.6% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 61.0% | 59.3% | 41.5% | 45.5% | 53.9% | 52.3% | 39.6% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 66.1% | 57.8% | 37.4% | 47.0% | 48.7% | 50.7% | 44.4% |
| 23 | 2021 | 7/7 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 73.1% | 50.9% | 35.2% | 46.8% | 44.5% | 46.9% | 43.6% | 2012 | 17/19 | 0.6 | 6.3 | 61.4% | 56.3% | 38.9% | 40.3% | 55.0% | 49.7% | 45.7% |
| 24 | 2022 | 13/13 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 68.7% | 56.2% | 41.6% | 57.8% | 45.5% | 51.5% | 41.7% | 2013 | 27/29 | 1.3 | 5.2 | 61.6% | 59.8% | 45.0% | 44.2% | 53.6% | 54.0% | 45.8% |
| 25 | 2023 | 29/29 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 63.8% | 55.8% | 40.3% | 45.3% | 44.7% | 50.2% | 41.7% | 2014 | 12/12 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 58.7% | 59.9% | 45.7% | 52.5% | 41.0% | 54.5% | 42.5% |
| 26 | 2024 | 34/37 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 66.1% | 59.9% | 44.3% | 52.5% | 48.5% | 54.6% | 43.4% | 2015 | 31/39 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 69.1% | 63.2% | 53.5% | 55.0% | 49.7% | 59.5% | 44.8% |
| 27 | 2025 | 20/35 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 64.3% | 68.2% | 44.2% | 68.7% | 36.7% | 59.7% | 43.9% | 2016 | 35/39 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 60.5% | 44.8% | 50.5% | 53.2% | 54.9% | 45.5% |
| 28 | 2026 | 25/28 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 63.9% | 59.0% | 43.2% | 44.9% | 44.8% | 52.9% | 41.9% | 2017 | 44/46 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 65.6% | 61.5% | 44.4% | 49.1% | 52.0% | 55.6% | 45.4% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 41/45 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 64.4% | 61.8% | 46.5% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 56.2% | 46.0% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28/28 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 69.7% | 59.1% | 43.8% | 51.0% | 54.3% | 54.4% | 44.8% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 65.0% | 53.6% | 42.6% | 35.2% | 43.8% | 50.0% | 42.8% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16/16 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 65.8% | 55.1% | 43.1% | 45.6% | 55.2% | 51.2% | 49.3% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19/21 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 64.4% | 53.7% | 43.8% | 49.8% | 49.2% | 49.9% | 45.1% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 37/40 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 66.2% | 57.5% | 43.0% | 47.8% | 54.7% | 52.7% | 50.3% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 28/30 | 0.2 | 4.9 | 63.5% | 55.1% | 40.2% | 47.0% | 46.8% | 49.5% | 43.7% |
| Career | — | 128/149 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 65.5% | 59.2% | 42.4% | 52.1% | 44.6% | 53.3% | 42.6% | — | 353/383 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 65.1% | 59.1% | 44.4% | 49.2% | 51.1% | 53.9% | 45.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1483 | 96.1 | -0.16 | -0.74 | 0.771 | 43.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1487 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1468 | 101.2 | -1.44 | -1.76 | 0.831 | 46.3% | — | +62 | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.08 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1499 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1468 | 104.4 | -3.16 | -0.61 | 0.900 | 47.5% | +23 | +64 | — | 23.5% | -1.41 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.34 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1547 | 120.8 | -3.76 | -1.11 | 0.820 | 45.3% | — | +21 | — | 26.7% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 | 2012 | 1485 | 109.3 | -4.45 | +0.03 | 0.909 | 47.7% | 0 | +73 | — | 40.9% | -0.71 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.4 | +0.05 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1686 | 118.4 | -2.96 | +0.15 | 0.858 | 46.9% | -9 | -59 | — | 33.3% | -1.23 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.37 | 2013 | 1505 | 119.0 | -1.69 | +1.15 | 0.995 | 49.9% | +10 | -7 | +46 | 40.6% | -0.36 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.5 | +0.31 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1712 | 126.2 | -3.79 | -0.06 | 0.837 | 46.0% | +17 | -88 | -66 | 34.8% | -1.20 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.8 | -1.29 | 2014 | 1510 | 105.5 | -1.40 | -0.49 | 0.933 | 48.6% | -11 | — | — | 36.7% | -0.70 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.7 | +0.32 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1679 | 130.3 | -1.56 | +0.24 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -2 | -29 | -36 | 42.4% | -0.46 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | +0.76 | 2015 | 1721 | 139.7 | +1.11 | +2.63 | 1.105 | 52.2% | +8 | — | -177 | 59.3% | +0.80 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.2 | +0.25 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1759 | 134.5 | +2.00 | +1.14 | 1.090 | 51.5% | +14 | -203 | -63 | 46.8% | -0.05 | 4–7 (36%) | 1–6 (14%) | 94.9 | -0.19 | 2016 | 1725 | 125.5 | -0.94 | +1.32 | 1.009 | 50.2% | +25 | -190 | -217 | 50.6% | +0.07 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–6 (33%) | 103.6 | +1.38 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1740 | 136.2 | -3.17 | -0.52 | 0.890 | 47.2% | +43 | -247 | — | 43.9% | -0.45 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.8 | +1.04 | 2017 | 1689 | 134.1 | -0.08 | +2.63 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +20 | -134 | -107 | 47.9% | -0.10 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–6 (54%) | 100.9 | -1.57 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1808 | 142.9 | -0.18 | +2.84 | 1.051 | 51.2% | +2 | -219 | -158 | 60.4% | +0.77 | 8–3 (73%) | 5–3 (63%) | 106.6 | +0.69 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1736 | 136.2 | -1.34 | +1.80 | 0.981 | 49.5% | +99 | -130 | -117 | 46.6% | -0.22 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.6 | -0.24 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1767 | 118.5 | +0.32 | +2.54 | 0.856 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.91 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1746 | 128.4 | -2.98 | +2.74 | 1.009 | 50.1% | +22 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.44 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.04 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1766 | 127.9 | -3.73 | +2.57 | 0.901 | 47.5% | -41 | -82 | -3 | 57.5% | +0.18 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.9 | -1.59 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1870 | 139.4 | -2.54 | +6.34 | 1.063 | 51.5% | -23 | -32 | -93 | 62.0% | +0.68 | 7–2 (78%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.3 | -1.77 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1697 | 119.9 | -5.55 | +0.83 | 0.866 | 46.6% | +16 | +33 | — | 41.4% | -0.93 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.10 |
| Career | — | 1816 | 133.0 | -2.09 | +0.08 | 0.913 | 47.9% | +16 | -83 | -58 | 40.7% | -0.62 | 24–26 (48%) | 14–19 (42%) | 97.6 | -0.22 | — | 1898 | 136.0 | -1.67 | +2.21 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +13 | -65 | -90 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 56–47 (54%) | 36–36 (50%) | 105.0 | -0.84 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lesia Tsurenko
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jun 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 3, 2018 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |