Cristina Bucsa
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Yuliia Starodubtseva | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Jasmine Paolini | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 1, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Cristina Bucsa vs Sara Bejlek H2H: 1-0
Cristina Bucsa holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Bejlek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cristina Bucsa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cristina Bucsa won the 2026 US Open first round 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Bucsa | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Sara Bejlek | Match data | Aug 31, 2026 | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Bucsa | #40 | #30 | 1,446 | 1,816 | 56 | 91 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sara Bejlek | #30 | #29 | 1,652 | 1,884 | 26 | 27 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Sara Bejlek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #161 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #61 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #103 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Sara Bejlek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1460 | 103.3 | -0.63 | +4.78 | 0.553 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1561 | 99.6 | -2.36 | -0.77 | 0.561 | 38.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1664 | 121.5 | -1.97 | +1.26 | 0.939 | 48.6% | — | +58 | — | 43.8% | -0.38 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.51 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1785 | 124.3 | -1.30 | -0.39 | 1.055 | 51.6% | -174 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.07 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.15 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1855 | 146.3 | -1.65 | +3.45 | 1.014 | 50.4% | +4 | -39 | -267 | 53.8% | +0.32 | 6–2 (75%) | 7–4 (64%) | 107.1 | -0.29 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1487 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 1499 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 1547 | 120.8 | -3.76 | -1.11 | 0.820 | 45.3% | — | +21 | — | 26.7% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 1686 | 118.4 | -2.96 | +0.15 | 0.858 | 46.9% | -9 | -59 | — | 33.3% | -1.23 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 1712 | 126.2 | -3.79 | -0.06 | 0.837 | 46.0% | +17 | -88 | -66 | 34.8% | -1.20 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.8 | -1.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 1679 | 130.3 | -1.56 | +0.24 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -2 | -29 | -36 | 42.4% | -0.46 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | +0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1759 | 134.5 | +2.00 | +1.14 | 1.090 | 51.5% | +14 | -203 | -63 | 46.8% | -0.05 | 4–7 (36%) | 1–6 (14%) | 94.9 | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1725 | 135.5 | -3.31 | -0.71 | 0.879 | 47.0% | +43 | -232 | — | 42.2% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.8 | +0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1816 | 132.8 | -2.10 | +0.05 | 0.911 | 47.9% | +15 | -81 | -58 | 40.4% | -0.64 | 24–26 (48%) | 14–19 (42%) | 97.6 | -0.26 | — | 1885 | 136.2 | -1.67 | +2.58 | 0.972 | 49.5% | -26 | +5 | -267 | 48.7% | -0.06 | 7–4 (64%) | 9–7 (56%) | 105.5 | -1.90 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Sara Bejlek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ashlyn Krueger | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 18, 2026 | H2H |
| Barbora Krejcikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 14, 2026 | H2H |