H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Janet Newberry H2H: 0-2
Janet Newberry holds a 2–0 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1979 Adelaide third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 75
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1979* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 7-6 6-4 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1972* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-1 6-0 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |