H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira H2H: 2-1
Cynthia Doerner holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cynthia Doerner won the 1975 Madrid Winter 2 semifinal 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 75
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1975* | Madrid Winter 2 | WTA 250 | SF | — | Cynthia Doerner | 6-3 7-6 | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1975* | Madrid Auto Club | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Cynthia Doerner | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | Match data |
| Mar 1, 1975* | Madrid Winter 1 | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | 6-3 7-6 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | — | — | — | 1,565 | 27 | 37 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |