H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 2-3 (incl. walkovers)

Daniela Hantuchova vs Amélie Mauresmo: 1–3 excluding walkovers; 2–3 including 1 walkover. Across 5 main-draw results including walkovers, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2007 Dubai Tennis Championships quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 3
5 main-draw results
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 3-6 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #19 Match data Feb 24, 2007* QF Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #22 (w/o) Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data Oct 21, 2006* QF Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #54 4-6 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data Jun 19, 2004* SF Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #10 6-2 7-6(3) Daniela Hantuchova #12 Match data Aug 17, 2002* SF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-2 3-6 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #81 Match data May 18, 2001* R16 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 7/49 2.1 2.6 61.5% 62.8% 53.0% 46.0% 45.9% 59.1% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 8/50 2.6 3.0 59.5% 62.1% 44.2% 43.0% 64.2% 55.1% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 15/63 4.0 3.2 58.2% 69.2% 46.3% 50.6% 45.0% 59.1% 47.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 42/60 3.4 2.7 63.8% 66.1% 44.7% 56.1% 46.8% 58.5% 42.5% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2007 74/78 3.5 2.6 65.4% 68.4% 47.9% 58.5% 49.2% 61.2% 45.2% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2008 36/42 2.1 2.2 64.4% 64.5% 45.8% 57.0% 50.2% 57.8% 43.5% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2009 57/61 2.4 2.4 63.3% 63.3% 46.3% 49.7% 49.1% 57.1% 43.5% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2010 49/56 2.7 2.6 64.9% 64.3% 46.9% 52.9% 49.4% 58.1% 43.8% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2011 64/66 3.2 2.6 62.8% 65.9% 49.7% 59.9% 47.6% 59.8% 45.0% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2012 38/47 2.4 3.7 62.2% 63.6% 45.7% 53.2% 51.4% 56.9% 41.3% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2013 42/47 2.6 3.4 60.9% 63.1% 43.8% 50.7% 46.6% 55.7% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 37/40 2.3 3.8 62.5% 61.8% 44.7% 51.5% 43.1% 55.5% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 32/34 2.1 3.9 66.6% 62.2% 47.7% 44.5% 46.3% 57.3% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/10 2.4 3.4 60.6% 53.1% 39.7% 35.1% 52.9% 48.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 2/2 3.0 5.5 65.7% 66.4% 37.9% 50.0% 39.2% 56.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 512/826 2.8 2.9 63.4% 64.6% 46.5% 53.3% 48.3% 58.0% 43.2% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.