H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 2-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–2 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2007 Dubai quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-4.

SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2007* Dubai WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 3-6 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #19 Match data
Oct 21, 2006* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Daniela Hantuchova #22 (w/o) Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Jun 19, 2004* Eastbourne WTA 500 SF Grass Daniela Hantuchova #54 4-6 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Aug 17, 2002* Montreal WTA 1000 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #10 6-2 7-6(3) Daniela Hantuchova #12 Match data
May 18, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-2 3-6 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7