H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 5-1

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 5–1 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2011 Toronto second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #24 6-3 6-4 Gisela Dulko #52 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #39 7-6(7) 6-1 Gisela Dulko #43 Match data
Sep 25, 2008* Beijing WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #13 6-3 6-1 Gisela Dulko #47 Match data
Oct 26, 2007* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #10 6-3 6-1 Gisela Dulko #37 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #18 6-2 6-0 Gisela Dulko #32 Match data
May 4, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Gisela Dulko #37 6-4 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,798 192 179 51.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,528 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2004 22–18 55.0% #33 1,713 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,726 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,702 0 2
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2008 18–20 47.4% #51 1,658 0 3
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,734 0 3
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,686 0 3
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,650 0 4
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,604 0 4
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 — — — — — — —