H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 4-2

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 4–2 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2015 Birmingham round of 32 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniela Hantuchova #77 7-6(6) 6-4 Marina Erakovic #90 Match data Jun 18, 2015* R32 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Daniela Hantuchova #73 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) Marina Erakovic #85 Match data Feb 14, 2015* SF Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #31 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Marina Erakovic #48 Match data Jan 30, 2014* R32 Paris Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Marina Erakovic #65 7-6(2) 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #75 Match data Apr 3, 2013* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Marina Erakovic #85 6-4 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #25 Match data Sep 17, 2011* QF Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #23 6-3 6-1 Marina Erakovic #144 Match data Jun 24, 2011* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5% — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 2003 7/49 2.1 2.6 61.5% 62.8% 53.0% 46.0% 45.9% 59.1% 46.5% 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2004 8/50 2.6 3.0 59.5% 62.1% 44.2% 43.0% 64.2% 55.1% 40.9% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2005 15/63 4.0 3.2 58.2% 69.2% 46.3% 50.6% 45.0% 59.1% 47.9% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2006 42/60 3.4 2.7 63.8% 66.1% 44.7% 56.1% 46.8% 58.5% 42.5% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2007 74/78 3.5 2.6 65.4% 68.4% 47.9% 58.5% 49.2% 61.2% 45.2% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2008 36/42 2.1 2.2 64.4% 64.5% 45.8% 57.0% 50.2% 57.8% 43.5% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2009 57/61 2.4 2.4 63.3% 63.3% 46.3% 49.7% 49.1% 57.1% 43.5% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2010 49/56 2.7 2.6 64.9% 64.3% 46.9% 52.9% 49.4% 58.1% 43.8% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2011 64/66 3.2 2.6 62.8% 65.9% 49.7% 59.9% 47.6% 59.8% 45.0% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2012 38/47 2.4 3.7 62.2% 63.6% 45.7% 53.2% 51.4% 56.9% 41.3% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2013 42/47 2.6 3.4 60.9% 63.1% 43.8% 50.7% 46.6% 55.7% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 37/40 2.3 3.8 62.5% 61.8% 44.7% 51.5% 43.1% 55.5% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 32/34 2.1 3.9 66.6% 62.2% 47.7% 44.5% 46.3% 57.3% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/10 2.4 3.4 60.6% 53.1% 39.7% 35.1% 52.9% 48.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 2/2 3.0 5.5 65.7% 66.4% 37.9% 50.0% 39.2% 56.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 512/826 2.8 2.9 63.4% 64.6% 46.5% 53.3% 48.3% 58.0% 43.2% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
18 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10
20 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24
24 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.