H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 4-2

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 4–2 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2015 Birmingham third round 7-6(6) 6-4.

SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
NZL Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 2015* Birmingham WTA 500 R32 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #77 7-6(6) 6-4 Marina Erakovic #90 Match data
Feb 14, 2015* Pattaya WTA 250 SF Hard Daniela Hantuchova #73 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) Marina Erakovic #85 Match data
Jan 30, 2014* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Daniela Hantuchova #31 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Marina Erakovic #48 Match data
Apr 3, 2013* Charleston WTA 500 R64 Clay Marina Erakovic #65 7-6(2) 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #75 Match data
Sep 17, 2011* Quebec City WTA 250 QF Hard Marina Erakovic #85 6-4 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #25 Match data
Jun 24, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #23 6-3 6-1 Marina Erakovic #144 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,701 105 131 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2008 16–16 50.0% #66 1,531 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,522 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,485 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,630 0 0
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2012 19–20 48.7% #66 1,600 0 0
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,673 0 1
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,609 0 1
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,543 0 1
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2016 11–8 57.9% #106 1,625 0 1
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,551 0 1
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7