H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Na Li H2H: 3-3

Daniela Hantuchova and Na Li are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 Beijing second round 6-0 6-4.

SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Na Li #5 6-0 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #31 Match data
Jun 17, 2011* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #25 7-6(7) 6-3 Na Li #4 Match data
Jan 23, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Na Li #17 7-5 3-6 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #25 Match data
Mar 10, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Daniela Hantuchova #18 7-5 4-6 6-1 Na Li #17 Match data
Mar 3, 2006* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Na Li #71 4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 Daniela Hantuchova #15 Match data
Feb 23, 2006* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #14 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) Na Li #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7