H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 3-4

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–3 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2011 Strasbourg quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 21, 2011* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Daniela Hantuchova #30 6-4 6-2 Nadia Petrova #27 Match data
Mar 25, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #25 6-2 6-4 Nadia Petrova #18 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #17 6-1 2-6 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #24 Match data
Oct 7, 2006* Stuttgart WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-2 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #19 Match data
Jan 14, 2005* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-0 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #31 Match data
Aug 1, 2003* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #24 6-1 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #9 Match data
May 26, 2000* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #182 7-6(4) 6-2 Nadia Petrova #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7