H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 4-3

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 4–3 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2010 Sydney third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 14, 2010* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #23 6-3 6-0 Virginie Razzano #19 Match data
May 26, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Virginie Razzano #36 6-3 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #33 Match data
Feb 20, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Virginie Razzano #58 6-2 1-6 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #41 Match data
Jan 5, 2007* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Virginie Razzano #88 6-1 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #17 Match data
Aug 29, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #11 6-3 6-2 Virginie Razzano #104 Match data
Jun 16, 2001* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Daniela Hantuchova #68 6-4 6-0 Virginie Razzano #105 Match data
Sep 26, 2000* Luxembourg WTA 500 R32 Carpet Daniela Hantuchova #135 1-6 6-4 6-2 Virginie Razzano #201 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 — — — — — — —