H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Danielle Collins vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 1-0

Danielle Collins holds a 1–0 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danielle Collins leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danielle Collins won the 2018 Miami Open second round 6-3 1-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Danielle Collins
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danielle Collins #93 6-3 1-6 6-1 Coco Vandeweghe #16 Match data Mar 23, 2018* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danielle Collins #343 #7 3,702 2,073 174 118 59.6% 0 1 0 2 1 4
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danielle Collins Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2014 0–1 0.0% #915 1,498 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2016 0–1 0.0% #259 1,492 0 0 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #177 1,484 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2018 18–17 51.4% #36 1,659 0 0 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2019 18–18 50.0% #29 1,717 0 0 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2020 10–6 62.5% #45 1,812 0 0 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2021 37–15 71.2% #29 1,891 0 2 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 2022 20–11 64.5% #14 1,898 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2023 18–18 50.0% #52 1,854 0 2 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2024 38–16 70.4% #11 1,950 0 4 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2025 15–14 51.7% #64 1,859 0 4 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danielle Collins Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
25 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2021 25 11 36 69.4% 11 3 14 78.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2022 17 6 23 73.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2023 17 15 32 53.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2024 16 10 26 61.5% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 79 190 58.4% 52 28 80 65.0% 11 11 22 50.0% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/293 of Danielle Collins's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Danielle Collins Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2014 1/1 2.0 0.0 59.0% 63.3% 52.9% 64.3% 20.0% 59.0% 32.3% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.3% 26.9% 42.9% 30.0% 50.0% 34.0% 36.6% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 56.3% 37.0% 33.3% 25.0% 33.3% 35.4% 40.0% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2018 30/35 2.4 3.2 58.0% 60.3% 46.2% 47.0% 47.7% 54.1% 41.8% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2019 35/36 3.2 3.1 59.4% 62.0% 47.0% 51.0% 52.5% 56.2% 41.8% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2020 16/16 3.5 3.5 58.9% 71.1% 48.3% 61.6% 48.3% 61.3% 43.8% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2021 52/52 3.6 3.9 54.6% 70.3% 48.5% 54.9% 54.3% 60.2% 46.1% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 2022 31/31 3.8 6.1 54.1% 69.6% 48.1% 57.9% 52.5% 59.6% 45.1% 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2023 36/36 3.6 4.6 59.0% 67.2% 47.2% 55.1% 48.1% 58.8% 42.2% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2024 50/54 3.8 4.8 56.5% 71.1% 47.4% 58.9% 52.9% 60.8% 45.4% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2025 26/30 4.2 5.2 57.9% 66.1% 49.5% 55.1% 51.5% 58.8% 41.9% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
Career — 279/293 3.5 4.3 57.0% 67.2% 47.7% 54.9% 51.3% 58.7% 43.7% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danielle Collins Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49
20 2014 1498 107.7 +4.54 +2.42 0.787 44.9% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.24 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12
22 2016 1492 98.2 -2.62 -4.63 0.555 35.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26
23 2017 1484 100.8 -2.48 +1.44 0.619 37.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.14 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43
24 2018 1659 126.6 -1.48 -1.03 0.910 48.1% +14 -93 -38 46.8% -0.30 9–4 (69%) 2–2 (50%) 106.1 +0.97 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72
25 2019 1717 138.4 -0.18 -0.13 0.953 49.3% -18 -87 -80 51.3% -0.12 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 101.1 -1.21 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00
26 2020 1813 147.3 +3.14 +1.35 1.131 52.7% -60 -109 — 60.0% +0.85 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -1.27 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76
27 2021 1891 152.7 +3.13 +2.70 1.158 53.3% +4 -43 — 71.3% +1.40 9–5 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 107.5 +0.72 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2022 1898 149.2 +2.47 +2.92 1.117 52.3% +79 -119 — 66.2% +0.81 3–5 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 +0.10 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2023 1855 153.7 +2.52 +1.03 1.025 50.4% +53 — — 53.6% +0.20 5–9 (36%) 5–7 (42%) 91.8 -2.00 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17
30 2024 1951 160.8 +3.69 +3.10 1.157 53.2% -11 +71 -239 68.1% +1.30 9–7 (56%) 7–1 (88%) 104.9 -1.22 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2025 1860 143.1 +1.81 -0.05 1.019 50.4% -7 +142 -159 50.7% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.97 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
Career — 2074 154.6 +2.01 +1.46 1.057 51.3% +14 -3 -124 59.0% +0.55 49–46 (52%) 38–24 (61%) 107.7 -1.76 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.