H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Danka Kovinic vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 1-1
Danka Kovinic and Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2015 Tianjin semifinal 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2015* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2015* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | 6-4 6-2 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danka Kovinic | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |