H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Danka Kovinic vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 1-1
Danka Kovinic and Monica Niculescu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on clay, while Monica Niculescu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2015 Prague third round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2015* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Danka Kovinic | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Monica Niculescu | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2014* | Florianopolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monica Niculescu | 6-3 6-1 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Monica Niculescu | #958 | #28 | 1,960 | 1,807 | 176 | 213 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danka Kovinic | Monica Niculescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #48 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #103 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #58 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #77 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #118 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |