H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Danka Kovinic vs Teliana Pereira H2H: 1-0
Danka Kovinic holds a 1–0 lead over Teliana Pereira in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2015 Tianjin fourth round 6-2 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 37
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Teliana Pereira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Teliana Pereira | #1,102 | #43 | 1,136 | 1,643 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danka Kovinic | Teliana Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #46 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #206 | 1,478 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,454 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |