H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Madison Brengle H2H: 2-0
Daria Kasatkina holds a 2–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daria Kasatkina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2023 Charleston third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2023* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Daria Kasatkina | 6-2 6-1 | Madison Brengle | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2017* | Toray Pan Pacific Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Madison Brengle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Madison Brengle | #210 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,740 | 94 | 151 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |